Case LawHigh Court › Mcarbon Tech Innovation Private Limited...

Mcarbon Tech Innovation Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 04 Mar 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mcarbon Tech Innovation Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Mcarbon Tech Innovation Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the said representation, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~36. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2489/2020 MCARBON TECH INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor and Mr. Shivansh Pandya, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Agarwa, Mr. Tushar Gupta and Mr. Akash Pratap Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R% 04.03.2020 C.M. No. 8678/2020 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2489/2020 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has received intimation that the refund would be granted in the next four weeks. Learned counsel for the respondent has tendered in Court a copy of the said communication dated 03.03.2020, which is taken on record. In view of the said representation, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in case the refund is not granted, it shall be open to the petitioner to revive the petition. VIPIN SANGHI, J MARCH 04, 2020kd SANJEEV NARULA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan