M.c.c v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
High Court
07 Sep 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
M.c.c v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Date of order
07 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M.c.c v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn." 3.The application for modification stands disposed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.C.C. No. 728 of 2015
Smt. Leela Chaudhary, Leagl Heir of Late Sundarlal Chaudhary, Millan Chauk, Near Atta Chakki, Old Fish Market, Camp Bhilai, P.S. Chhavni, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
---- Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
For AppellantFor Respondent
:Shri M.K.Sinha, Advocate.:Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief JusticeHon'ble Shri P. Sam Koshy, J.
Order on Board
Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice
07/09/2015
1.Heard Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Respondent.
2.Considering the averments in the modification application supported by affidavit with regard to what may have transpired in the Court as is submitted, the order dated 4.8.2015 in Tax Case No. 14 of 2015 is modified to read as follows:
"1. After some argument, Learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks
leave to withdraw the appeal for availing alternate remedies.
2. We make no observation with regard to the same.
3. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn."
3.The application for modification stands disposed.
Sd/- (Navin Sinha)CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue