Case LawHigh Court › Mcc/1253/2023 Of Suraj Bhan Oil Private...

Mcc/1253/2023 Of Suraj Bhan Oil Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1)

High Court 19 Oct 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_gwl
Parties
Mcc/1253/2023 Of Suraj Bhan Oil Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1)
Date of order
19 Oct 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Mcc/1253/2023 Of Suraj Bhan Oil Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1), the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT GWALIORBEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ROHIT ARYA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI)ON THE 19[th] OF OCTOBER, 2023 MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 1253 of 2023 BETWEEN:- SURAJ BHAN OIL PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR SANJAY BANSAL S/O SHRI GOVIND PRASADBANSAL, AGED 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION - BUSINESS,R/O 95 - JIWAJI GANJ, MORENA, DISTRICT MORENA(MADHYA PRADESH) (BY SHRI DHARMENDRA DWIVEDI - ADVOCATE) .....APPLICANT AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2( 1 ) , AAYKAR BHAWAN, CITY CENTRE, GWALIOR(MADHYA PRADESH) (NONE FOR RESPONDENT) .....RESPONDENT This application coming on for hearing this day, Justice Rohit Arya passed the following: ORDER I.A.No.4248/2023, an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act forcondonation of delay, is taken up, considered and allowed for the reasonsmentioned therein. Delay in filing the present MCC stands condoned. This is an application for restoration of Review Petition No.9/2023 whichwas dismissed for non-compliance of common conditional peremptory orderdated 20.03.2023. For the reasons assigned in the application, which is supported by anaffidavit, sufficient cause is made out for restoration of Review PetitionNo.9/2023. Hence, the same is allowed. Accordingly, Review Petition No.9/2023 is restored to its originalnumber. A copy of this order be placed in the record of Review PetitionNo.9/2023. This M.C.C. stands disposed of accordingly. (ROHIT ARYA)JUDGEAK/-ANAND KUMAR 2023.10.19 17:21:59 +05'30' (AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI))JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan