Case LawHigh Court › Mcc/1305/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Mcc/1305/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Sanjay Kumar

High Court 25 Sep 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Mcc/1305/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Sanjay Kumar
Date of order
25 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mcc/1305/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Sanjay Kumar, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
mrs.mishra 1 MCC No.1305/2014 25/9/2014. Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for theapplicant. Keeping in view the provisions of HighCourt Rules, as this is an application for restorationof an appeal which has been dismissed the officeojection is over ruled. This application has been filed forrestoration of ITA No.85/2010, which was dismissedfor non compliance with the peremptory orderpassed by this Court on 12.12.2013. There beingsome delay I.A. No.11649/2014 has been filed. Keeping in view the reasons given theapplication which is supported by the affidavit ofcompetent authority himself and finding the sameto be bonafide, both the applications are allowed.Condoning the delay in filing the restorationapplication, the restoration application itself isallowed. ITA No.85/2010 is restored to its originalfile. It be placed for orders before an appropriateBench. Application stands allowed and disposedof. (Rajendra Menon) (Anil Sharma) Judge Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan