Case LawHigh Court › Mcc/1446/2011 Of Smt. Leena Cherian v. T...

Mcc/1446/2011 Of Smt. Leena Cherian v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 (I)

High Court 10 Oct 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Mcc/1446/2011 Of Smt. Leena Cherian v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 (I)
Date of order
10 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Mcc/1446/2011 Of Smt. Leena Cherian v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 (I), the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Considering aforesaid, in the interest of justice, we allow the prayer made by the petitioner and accordingly allowed time period of four months from 19.9.2011 in this case also with the same terms and conditions which were envisaged in order dated 27.8.2011 in M.C.C.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

10.10.2011 Shri Mukesh Agrawal, Counsel for the applicant. Shri Sanjay Lal, Counsel for the respondent. It is submitted by Shri Lal that in other identical matters this Court has allowed further four months time from 19.9.2011 for the compliance of order dated 1.3.2011 passed in W.P.3466/11 and similar time period may be extended in this matter also. Considering aforesaid, in the interest of justice, we allow the prayer made by the petitioner and accordingly allowed time period of four months from 19.9.2011 in this case also with the same terms and conditions which were envisaged in order dated 27.8.2011 in M.C.C. No.1187 of 2011. With the aforesaid, this M.C.C. is finally disposed of with no order as to costs. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt. Vimla Jain)JUDGE JUDGEvj
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan