Mcc/187/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Jabalpur v. Shri Satyapal Grover
High Court
05 Feb 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Mcc/187/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Jabalpur v. Shri Satyapal Grover
Date of order
05 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Mcc/187/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Jabalpur v. Shri Satyapal Grover, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Since the monetary limit involved in this appealpertaining to Assessment Year 2004-05 is only in the sumof Rs.13,74,836/- (which is less than 20,00,000/-), inview of the Circular dated 10[th] December, 2015, issuedunder the signature of Commissioner of Income Tax(AJ), C.B.D.T., Government of India,...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
shukla
1
M.C.C. No.187/2016
05.02.2016
Shri Sanjay Lal, Advocate for the applicant.
Heard counsel for the applicant.
For the reasons stated in the application, beingsufficient cause, in the interest of justice and as thelitigant should not suffer for the mistake of Advocate,application is allowed.
I.T.A. No.62/2010 is restored to the file to itsoriginal number and taken up for hearing forthwith.
Heard on I.T.A. No.62/2010.
Since the monetary limit involved in this appealpertaining to Assessment Year 2004-05 is only in the sumof Rs.13,74,836/- (which is less than 20,00,000/-), inview of the Circular dated 10[th] December, 2015, issuedunder the signature of Commissioner of Income Tax(AJ), C.B.D.T., Government of India, New Delhi, whichis placed on record, this appeal is disposed of leavingquestions of law open.
(A. M. Khanwilkar)
(Sanjay Yadav)Judge
Chief Justice
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue