Case LawHigh Court › Mcc/264/2012 Of M/S Suresh Brothers Raip...

Mcc/264/2012 Of M/S Suresh Brothers Raipur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jabalpur

High Court 21 Mar 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Mcc/264/2012 Of M/S Suresh Brothers Raipur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jabalpur
Date of order
21 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Mcc/264/2012 Of M/S Suresh Brothers Raipur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jabalpur, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

<<7 Ainit HIGHCOURT OFCHHATnSGARHATBILASPUR M,C,aNoJ264M2012 :M/8. Suresh Brotiiers, Raipur. APPELLANT VER8U8 RESPONDENTCammission^r aflaicome Ta^ Jabalpur, APPLICATIQiN FQR RESTORATIQN OF THE CASE Coram:Hoa'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri &Hon'>bl@ Shri MamnAka Mohaa Slirivastava, JJ.Hon'>bl@ Shri MamnAka Mohaa Slirivastava, JJ. Preserrt:Shri M.K.Sinha,, Advocate fhr the appella^t.Shri Saiyay Patel, Advocate fw tfe respoadteid. ORDER (Passed[on][ 21st][ day][ ofMarch,][ 2012)] 1.Leamed covmel appearmg for tfae a^petlar^ coald aet app€?aronaccount of bona fide mistake, therefore, M.C.C. No. 113/1991wfaich was dismissed on 14*02<201^, may be restGSbdtoMffle.2.Reasonable and suffident cause has been showsi. M.C.C. No.113/1991, is restoredto tiie original file. 3.A copy of this order be pla<?ed on reeord of M,C.C, No. ^ 113/1991, and fhe same be listed for hearmg, Sd/-Sd/-Satish K.AgnihotriManindraMohansbrivastavaJudgeJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan