Case LawHigh Court › Mcc/2718/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inc...

Mcc/2718/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. Shri Satish Jain

High Court 24 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_ind
Parties
Mcc/2718/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. Shri Satish Jain
Date of order
24 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mcc/2718/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. Shri Satish Jain, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: BENCH AT INDORE M.C.C. No.2718/2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-II v.s Shri Satish JainIndore, dated 24.10.2018 Ms. Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for thepetitioner. The present petition has been filed for restorationof R.P. No.452/2018, which was dismissed on account ofnon-compliance of order dated 13.08.2018. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed anaffidavit along with the restoration application and it hasbeen stated that she was not aware of the order passed bythis Court and the same was not complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner has been able tomake out a prima facie case for restoration of R.P.No.452/2018. Resultantly, the present M.C.C. stands allowed.R.P. No.452/2018 is hereby restored to its original numberand the same be listed on 4[th] December 2018. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall alsocomply with the order dated 13.08.2018 within two weeks. Let a copy of this order be kept in the file of R.P.No.452/2018. Certified copy, as per rules. (S.C. Sharma) Judge (Virender Singh)Judge RaviDigitally signed by Ravi Prakash Date: 2018.10.24 17:21:22 +05'30'
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan