Mcc/2742/2023 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax I v. M/S Aadhya Herbals And Organic
High Court
20 Nov 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_ind
Parties
Mcc/2742/2023 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax I v. M/S Aadhya Herbals And Organic
Date of order
20 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Mcc/2742/2023 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax I v. M/S Aadhya Herbals And Organic, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA
ON THE 20[th] OF NOVEMBER, 2023MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 2742 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I, AAYKARBHAWAN, WHITE CHURCH ROAD, INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)
(MS. VEENA MANDLIK, COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT).
.....APPLICANT
AND
M/S AADHYA HERBALS AND ORGANIC, 112-113, SILVERSANCHORA CASTLE, 7-8 RNT MARG INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
This application coming on for admission this day, Justice Sushrut
Arvind Dharmadhikari passed the following:
ORDER
Heard on restoration application.
2 . This MCC has been filed for restoration of ITA No.96 of 2023,
which was dismissed due to non compliance of the Common Conditional orderdated 31.08.2023.
3. Looking to the grounds mentioned in the application, the same isallowed and ITA No.96 of 2023 is restored to its original number subject topayment of cost of Rs.1000/- (Rupees One Thousand Only) to be deposited in
the M.P. High Court Legal Services Committee,Indore within sevenworking days from today and a receipt thereof be produced before theRegistry.
4. Let a copy of this order be placed in the record of ITA No.96 of
2023.
Accordingly, M.C.C. stands disposed of.
Certified copy as per rules.
(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI)(PRANAY VERMA)JUDGEJUDGEvidya
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue