In Mcc/281/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. M/S Harnarayan And Co. Bijuri, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Miscellaneous Civil Case No.281/2014
QO47014
Shri Rajesh Pandey, Advocatefor the applicant.This is an application for restoration of ITA No.57/2009.It is sad that despite order dated 29.6.2009 to remove thedefault within four weeks or else the appeal snali stand dismissedwithout reference to the Bench, the default was not removed by the|applicant. ITA No.5/7/2009 was, therefore, dismissed due to non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 29.6.2009. ©
There is nothing on record to suggest tnat defaults nave been.removed till this date. This application for restoration filed after almost|five years is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. |
(AJIT SINGH)(SUSHIL KUMAR GUIPTA)JUDGE|JUDGE |
SS-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue