Case Law › High Court › Mcc/297/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Mcc/297/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Itarsi Oila Nd Flour Mills Pvt Ltd

High Court 07 Aug 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

07 Aug 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mcc/297/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Itarsi Oila Nd Flour Mills Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

-^ XI-HC-22 Cb^<ht^^ ^ XI-HC-22 3T^r 'q^?MCC N~&-^^^^i^di ^rRl^.....................................^ <=fr'l^sr' 'f^TRF^n^T371^?T^T<=hl^(d^r1 '^RTf ^ ft^ Tf^R^R3?TT^T'^najT'^Tft?r^7 ^srf^FT ^37T^T5b^i<^ <yRa^ShriS. RaieshwaraRao, dpes not dispute the fact that the abovetierror has crept in the said order.Heard learned counsel fcir the parties.Perused the origina!record of t.T.R. No.47/2000 ancit is found that in the order dated20.07.2009.the descriptionoftherespondenthas been wrongiymentioned.The above tvpographical|error is apparent on the face of therecord which is required to be conjected and is accordingly corrected.Inplace of "M/s. Adarsh Ispat UdyogPvt. Ltd., 56, Akash Ganga Complex,Supela, Bhilai (MP)", "M/s. ItarsOj! and^Flour Milis Pvt. Ltd., K.N.Building, Subhash Road, Raipur (<^G)" be read.Copy of this order be plac|ed in the record of I.T.R. No.47/2000also.—Sd/-Sd/-DhirendraMishraR.N. CbandrakarJudgeJudgeTya^^^[*\]*\ r*^*\

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.