Mcc/3028/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Umesh Kajve Pro
High Court
09 Dec 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Mcc/3028/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Umesh Kajve Pro
Date of order
09 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mcc/3028/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Umesh Kajve Pro, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The High Court Of Madhya PradeshMCC No. 3028 of 2018
(COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVs UMESH KAJVE PRO.)
Jabalpur, Dated : [09][-][12][-][2021]
Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
I.A. No.11436/2019, an application for condonation of delay istaken up, considered and allowed for the reasons mentioned therein.
Delay of 195 days is hereby condoned.
This MCC has been preferred for restoration of ITA No.44/2015,which was dismissed for non compliance of common conditionalperemptory order dated 27.02.2018.
In view of averments made in the petition which is duly supportedb y affidavit of petitioner, prayer for restoration of ITA No.44/2015 ishereby accepted.
Looking to the nature of default, subject to payment of cost ofRs.2,000/- (Rs. Two Thousand Only) to be deposited with High CourtLegal Services Committee, Jabalpur within a period of 15 days fromtoday, ITA No.44/2015 is restored to its original number for beingadjudicated on its own merits.
Accordingly, MCC stands allowed.
A copy of this order be placed in the record of ITA No.44/2015.
(SHEEL NAGU)(PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV)JUDGEJUDGE
ss
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue