Case Law › High Court › Mcc v. Income Tax Department Thr

Mcc v. Income Tax Department Thr

High Court 06 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_gwl

Parties

Date of order

06 Oct 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Mcc v. Income Tax Department Thr, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

The High Court Of Madhya PradeshMCC-3239-2017 (BHIND DISTRICT CO OPERATIOVE CENTRAL BANK LTD. THR.Vs INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THR.) 2 Gwalior, Dated :[06][-][10][-][2018] Shri R.B.S. Tomar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri B.P.S. Bhadoriya, learned counsel for the respondents. There is delay of 1113 days in filing this application for restoration. Condonation whereof is being sought vide I.A. No. 17187/2017. As not opposed by the respondents, I.A. No. 17187/2017 is allowed. Delay is condoned. I.A. No. 17187/2017 stands disposed of. Heard on application for restoration of ITA No. 8/2014, which wasdismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 27.08.2014. For the reasons, which find mention in the application, which preventedthe petitioner to comply with the dated 27.08.2014 passed in ITA No. 8/2014within the time stipulated, good cause is made out. Consequently, ITA No.8/2014 is restored to its original number subject to deposit of costs imposed earlier within a period of seven days. It is made clear that if the costs is not deposited within the said time, the dismissal order shall revive. MCC stands disposed of. Let a copy of this order be placed on record of ITA No. 8/2014. (SANJAY YADAV)JUDGE (VIVEK AGARWAL)JUDGE shanu*

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.