Case Law › High Court › Mcc/333/2010 Of Assistant Commissioner O...

Mcc/333/2010 Of Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd

High Court 23 Jul 2010 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

23 Jul 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Mcc/333/2010 Of Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

^ Goraun:;ti^'ll|ipjpi»agB^!^i- MjC.C.NOiSSS o€2 WAasteanfe^Geimmhi^iieF ^ %een»Tax.GiiCte-I.Ra^yr APPUCANT^ppellant)\te Respondent. SeuHiSastom.Co^elctoA.lA ^ialfegfioRlor^^BraSoraBflfeasBt^aie^^Ne^ Present:Shtt Ri^wvShrhgadtea,'ORAL <0«DER^sr^sK^ORAL <0«DER^sr^sK^ •;'';... Heard on IANo.2^1(»tereOTeto^ 1iljnfftt»re^orate)nappUc^ wi. 2.Qn dye <on«d8ra8onN ttw> Jiwsen®assigned tn th®appttertien, ^wh is also suppwtocl l^ 1ha ^ri^^comnaissloner <rf Inconw T®<. lA.No.ii8 altowed.Delay hi fidng ttie nwtora^on applifflition wconctoned. -3. Heard on M.G.C. No 333^{yt@ fer<rf TaxCase Na^a^tO, aslhesame t^^^b^ (PR)on aceoynt <tf non-efflTV>ltanee of tt»pweropt^ wctor[by][ this][ Court][ on][ 03.03^010t]passed On due ©wisideraiwmof^h»flwwemNltiWappllcatxm, whteh fe ateo suppoi-tied (qf 1w amtewtt of Slnl •\ .Prtya A.K. Panda, G«»nfflis8ioiwof toG^^T'i^ Wft arr stdteWedthat toamed <»yrre^for ttwhs»^fmwntfflem cause ^ non^inpUance of ttte psr^^3.3.2010..:.:•'.•-,•:,:\'5.Aa»(dtn®ly,the appUcadi^te^ri^^Ne.S^fflOtO.tediroetodto^'WHVtoSP«*j^to^pa^Tiein^eo8te(R8.20^^h1tN>N^®mLega) ^clCommittee, Bllwpu^wtt^ape^ Sdf-R.N. ChandrakarJudge Sd/-DUrendra MishraJudge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.