In Mcc/342/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bhopal Motors Limited, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
mrs.mishra
MCC No.342/2014
8/8/2014.
Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for thepetitioner.
This application has been filed forrestoration of ITA No.101/2009 which has beendismissed due to non compliance of peremptoryorder passed by this Court. There being somedelay in filing of the application, I.A.No.6423/2014hasbeenfiledseekingcondonation of delay in filing of the application.Keeping in view the reasons given inthe application and finding them to be bonafide,both the applications are allowed. Delay in filingthe application for restoration is allowed andrestoration application itself is allowed. I.T.A.No.101/2009 is restored to its original number.It be placed for orders before the appropriateBench.
Applicationstandsallowedanddisposed of.
(Rajendra Menon) (Alok Verma) Judge Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue