Case Law › High Court › Mcc/346/2011 Of Assistant Commisioner Of...

Mcc/346/2011 Of Assistant Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rana Project

High Court 23 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

23 Jun 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Mcc/346/2011 Of Assistant Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rana Project, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

•^^f^^Q^\^^ uw :blni; •\ •!i6H CQUP-TOFGHHATTi-SGARHAT B!LASPURDB:Hon'bte Shrl Satish K Aanihotrs &Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shvam Sharma, JJ,iyi.C.C. tPR) N0.1323/20103M&il;ncc-Assistant C-emmissiQn of IncomeARplicantVs.'ResDonderstM/s. Rana Project-^fc Present: ShrSameer Shriyastava, counsel for the applicant.^'.^Z^.-._1.O R A t.(23.06.2011.)Heard.2.Learned counssl for ths app'Icant seeks permissiQn to withdrawtl'ieilOH £Sth8 SBFTiS JS filSd Upd@r HlISCOtlCSDtlQH.3-Psrmisslon Is QTsntsd.4.Aecordingly, the appiication Is dismissed aswithdrawn.<?<i1Sd/-Sd/-R-S.SharmaSatishK.AgnihotriJudgeJudge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.