Case Law › High Court › Mcc/370/2017 Of The Principal Commission...

Mcc/370/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bharat Kumar Verma

High Court 21 Jul 2017 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_ind

Parties

Date of order

21 Jul 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mcc/370/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bharat Kumar Verma, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

21.07.2017 Ms. Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for the applicant. Heard on the question of admission. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that due to non-compliance of common conditional order dated 18.05.2017, the appeal was dismissed in default on 10.07.2017. She has further submitted that the applicant will cure the defect within a period of seven days from today. Considering the aforesaid and for the reasons assigned in the application, which is supported by the affidavit of learned counsel for the applicant, we restore ITA No.40/2017 to its original number and direct the applicant to cure the defect, as pointed out on 18.05.2017 within a period of seven days from today failing which, this order shall stand dismissed without any reference to the Court. With the aforesaid, M.C.C. No.370/2017 is allowed and ITA No.40/2017 is accordingly, restored to its original number. (P. K. Jaiswal) Judge (Ved Prakash Sharma)Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.