Case LawHigh Court › Mcc/492/2018 Of Smt. Sudha Simhal v. The...

Mcc/492/2018 Of Smt. Sudha Simhal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 12 Dec 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Mcc/492/2018 Of Smt. Sudha Simhal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mcc/492/2018 Of Smt. Sudha Simhal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1- The High Court of Madhya Pradesh MCC. No.492/2018 (SMT. SUDHA SIMHALVs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS) Jabalpur, Dated: 12/12/2019 Shri Mukesh Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicant. Heard on I.A. No.3260/18 for condonation of delay. We are satisfied with the cause shown for belatedly filing thisapplication. Accordingly, the said I.A. is allowed and delay is condoned. He is also heard on main application. The applicant has assigned justifiable reasons for restorationof ITA. No.29/17, which was dismissed for not complying with thecommon conditional order. The application is supported byaffidavit of the applicant. Accordingly, office order dismissing thesaid ITA is recalled. ITA. No.29/17 is restored to its originalnumber. A typed copy of this order be kept in the record of ITA. MCC is disposed of. (Sujoy Paul) (Smt. Anjuli Palo) Judge Judge mohsin Digitally signed by MOHAMMED MOHSIN QURESHI Date: 2019.12.13 11:51:54 +05'30'
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan