In Mcc/499/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax I v. Ritesh Ajmera, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
MCC NO.499/17
05.09.2017:
Ms.Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for
the applicant.
This is an application for
restoration of ITA No.01/2017 which wasdismissed on 21.08.2017 for want ofprosecution.
Learned counsel for the applicantsubmitted that a delisting applicationwas filed on behalf of the appellant,therefore, she could not mark presence on21.08.2017. This fact is duly supportedby the affidavit of the learned counselfor the appellant.
Considering the aforesaid, we are ofthe view that sufficient cause is made
out to restore ITA No.01/2017.
Accordingly, the application forrestoration is allowed and ITA No.01/2017is restored back to its original number.MCC stands disposed of.
(P.K.JAISWAL) JUDGE
(VIRENDER SINGH) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue