In Mcc/504/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax I v. Kheraj Rijhwani, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: On due consideration of the aforesaid, we are ofthe view that the cause shown is sufficient to allow therestoration application and restore the appeal to itsoriginal number.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
M.C.C. No.504 of 2017
06/09/2017
Ms. Veena Mandlik, learned Counsel for thepetitioner.
Heard.
This is an application for restoration of I.T.A.
No.128/2016.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submittedthat on 21.8.2017, a de-listing application was given bythe petitioner and, therefore, she could not mark herpresence, when the matter was called for. This fact isduly supported by the affidavit of learned Counsel forthe petitioner.
On due consideration of the aforesaid, we are ofthe view that the cause shown is sufficient to allow therestoration application and restore the appeal to itsoriginal number. Accordingly, prayer for restoration ofI.T.A. No.128/2016 is allowed. I.T.A. No.128/2016 isrestored to its original number.
M.C.C. No.504 of 2017 is allowed and disposed of.
(P. K. Jaiswal) (Virender Singh)Judge Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue