Mcc/525/2023 Of Rakesh Kumar Bhandari v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 (1)
High Court
03 Apr 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_ind
Parties
Mcc/525/2023 Of Rakesh Kumar Bhandari v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 (1)
Date of order
03 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mcc/525/2023 Of Rakesh Kumar Bhandari v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 (1), the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTAON THE 3[rd] OF APRIL, 2023
MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 525 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
RAKESH KUMAR BHANDARI S/O SHRI PRAKASHCHANDRA BHANDARI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,OCCUPATION: BUSINESS PROP SHRI SHARANAM AUTOCENTRE, KHANDWA ROAD, DISTRICT KHARGONE(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
(SHRI ASHISH GOYAL, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT.)
AND
1.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4( 1 ) AAYAKAR BHAWAN, OPPOSITE WHITECHURCH RESIDENCY AREA, DISTRICT INDORE(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1AAYAKAR BHAWAN OPPOSITE WHITE CHURCHRESIDENCY AREA INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(MS. VEENA MANDLIK, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT.)
This application coming on for orders this day, JUSTICE SUSHRUT
ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI passed the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave of this Court to withdrawthis application on the ground that the same has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the same is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
ajit
(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI)JUDGE
2
(PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue