Case LawHigh Court › Mcc/532/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Mcc/532/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Bilaspur v. S.e.c.l. Bilaspur

High Court 02 Nov 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Mcc/532/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Bilaspur v. S.e.c.l. Bilaspur
Date of order
02 Nov 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Mcc/532/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Bilaspur v. S.e.c.l. Bilaspur, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: When the case is cailed out for hearing, none appears for theapplicant to ptessthis petition.Aooordi.ngly, this petition is dismissed for this petition is dismissed for petition is dismissed for is dismissed for dismissed for fornon-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

%? ^ (^4- Ui- ^^2-}S'^~ H!GH COURTOFCHHATTISSARH: BILASPUR Division Bench .C.C. (PR) HO. 1456 OF 2008 Coram:Hon'bte Shri Satjsh K. Agnihotri, 4 Aepli^nt CommissionerofSnoomeTax.Bilaspur . Vereus Respendent S.E.C.L. Bilaspur (Applicationfor restoranon of I.T.A.No. 1 of 2006.) Present None appears for the applicant. (Passed on 2 November, 8)07) Thefollowingora!orderoftheCourtwaspassedbyHon'bieShnJagdishBhaila,ActingC.J. When the case is cailed out for hearing, none appears for theapplicant to ptessthis petition.Aooordi.ngly, this petition is dismissed for this petition is dismissed for petition is dismissed for is dismissed for dismissed for fornon-prosecution. Aooordi.ngly, this petition is dismissed for this petition is dismissed for petition is dismissed for is dismissed for dismissed for for Sd/-satishK-AgIuhotriJudgc Sd/-Acting Chief Justice
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan