Case Law › High Court › Mcc/613/2013 Of Assitant Commissioner Of...

Mcc/613/2013 Of Assitant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. M/S Dayalal Meghji And Ors

High Court 30 Mar 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

30 Mar 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mcc/613/2013 Of Assitant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. M/S Dayalal Meghji And Ors, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH [ BILASPUR]MCC No.61 3/201 3Assistant Commissioner ofAPPLICANTIncomeTax,Circie1-1,RaipurVsM/sDayaial‘ MeghjiandNON-APPLICANTCo., Maiviya Road, RaipurklL“ Nb Inne on behalf of the appiicant.ORDER ON BOARD30.03.2015Per T.P. sr§aa, J.1. When the matteris caiied outnone appeared onbehalf of theappiicant. Thispetitionis for restoratiorl No.09/2006, dismissed[as][ time]barredvide order dated1.by theDivisionBenchof thisCourt.barredvide order dated1.by theDivisionBenchof thisCourt. Petition and defauit pointed[out][ by][ the][ Registry]perused. In the light of subsequent change[of][ law][ and]judgement[of][ Apex]Court [dated]05.07.2010 passed in SLP(Civil)/201O (CC 7857/2010), the[applicant][ is]required to file petition for recalling/review[of][ the][ order][ in]question.05.07.2010 passed in SLP(Civil)/201O (CC 7857/2010), the[applicant][ is]required to file petition for recalling/review[of][ the][ order][ in]question. With the aforesaid observation, the petitiondismissed reserving liberty to theapplicant to take appropriate[steps.]applicant to take appropriate[steps.] 6.No order as to costs. Sdl—Sd/llnder Singh[Uboweja]T. P.Sha-rmaJudgeJudge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.