Case LawHigh Court › Mcc/80/2021 Of M/S Mahendra Builders And...

Mcc/80/2021 Of M/S Mahendra Builders And Developers v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 22 Jan 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Mcc/80/2021 Of M/S Mahendra Builders And Developers v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Mcc/80/2021 Of M/S Mahendra Builders And Developers v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

The High Court Of Madhya PradeshMCC-80-2021 (M/S MAHENDRA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERSVs PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX) [22][-][01][-][2021]Jabalpur, Dated : Heard through Video Conferencing. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Patel, Advocate for the applicant. Heard on I.A. No.394/2021 - an application for condonation of delay of 349 days in filing the restoration application. For the stated reasons, application is allowed. Delay is condoned. This restoration application has been filed seeking restoration of I.T.A.No.173/2018 which was dismissed on account of non-compliance ofperemptory order dated 25.02.2019. For the reasons mentioned in the restoration application supported bythe affidavit of Ramesh Patidar, partner of the applicant firm, this MCC isallowed and I.T.A. No.173/2018 be restored to its original number, subjectto deposit of cost of Rs.1,000/- before the Madhya Pradesh State LegalServices Authority and producing receipt thereof before the Registry of thisCourt. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed and disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)CHIEF JUSTICE (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)JUDGE psm
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan