Case Law › High Court › M.c.c.n0.710F2010 v. Respondentcommissio...

M.c.c.n0.710F2010 v. Respondentcommissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur(Cg

High Court 11 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

11 Feb 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M.c.c.n0.710F2010 v. Respondentcommissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur(Cg, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

^i" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURCoram:Hon' ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, &Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ M.C.C.N0.710F2010 PetitionerM/s.MaheshwariIndustries,LightIndustrial Area, Bhilai. Vs. RespondentCommissioner of Income Tax, Raipur(CG) (Application for restoration of Income Tax Appeal No. 43 of 2003) Present:<,-.— Shri R.R. Sinha, counsel for the petitioner. Oral Order (Passed on this 11th day of February, 2010) Per Dhirendra Mishra, J. Heard. The petitioner has filed this application for restoration of Income TaxAppeal No. 43 of 2003 which was dismissed by this court vide order dated19-1-2010 forwant of prosecution. On dueconsideration of the reasons assigned in the applicationwhichis also supportedby affidavit of the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the application is allowed and Income Tax Appeal is directed tobe restored to its originalnumber,subject to petitioner's depositingRs.200/- to the High Court Legal Aid Committee, Bilaspur, within a periodof two weeks from today and thereafter on furnishing the receipt thereofIncome Tax Appeal No. 43 of 2003be listed for hearing. Sd/-Sd/-Dhirendra MishraR.N. ChandrakarJudgeJudge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.