Mccno v. Respondents Commissioner Of Tncome Of Tncome Tncome
High Court
04 Sep 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Mccno v. Respondents Commissioner Of Tncome Of Tncome Tncome
Date of order
04 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Mccno v. Respondents Commissioner Of Tncome Of Tncome Tncome, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
"a^
•-^^^l,
m:^
(N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR
(C.G.)
^3-7- /2QiP ^'
MCCNo.
Petitionert/s Swadesh Agro Tech Ltd,ZjiThrough Partner SanjeevAgrawal C-17,ParijatCommercial Complex, E-5,'ft-^'Arera Colony, Bhopal( M.P.) M.P.)pti,?^^u""'l,..^-I'riQ^Q—-^r-^rVersusRespondentsCommissioner of tncome of tncome tncome
( M.P.) M.P.)
Commissioner of tncome of tncome tncomeTax, Central RevenueBuilding, Civil Lines,Raipur, (C.G.)
The Asst. Commissioner of^-lncomeTqx-32/32Bungalaw, Bhitai. (C.G.)3,$>,-y<L^hn-0&^&voj(((^\{7' At^r- ^^^^ A^-<-(2?1/V^MM1^TheAddLDITf)^(Investigation) Cen^ralRevenue Buiklding, CivilLines, Raipur (C.G.)
APPUCATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE W.P. fT) No.^^998/2009 DISMISSED ON ACCOUNTOF NONAPPERANCE.
^
755T ^WW^, tS>-c{1<-l<l(S, ic<(?J)|^14<i^7.c^-t^.^/]0NIH<ytf *^|eb20^cc- i-3-7/l,^W^ '<T3T^ (^f^<^)^T^^f^TWX^T^^"3crf^TW^T^i^!<n41'i ^iH<rif ^f Fs^) <f^;^i7^mws^T ^pqw^~ ^tRrq S^T^TS.B.: Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohfan Shrivastava. J.IK04-09-2012Shri A K Patil, counsel ftw th^ petittoner.Shri Anand Dadariya, coureelfor the responctente.Heard.Learned counsel for the petitioner submtts that proper affidavtthas been filaJ by him today.The same is taken on TWO^. \Also heard on prayerfor restc}ration.L^rned counsel ft>r the re^pondents opposes the prayer forrestcu-ation.Takjng into consideration th^grounds unged in the appUcationfor restoration, I am satisfied that j|j^ and sufficient cause has beenshown by the counsel for hte non-ap()earance on 17-01-2011, when theca^ was calted for hearing.Accordingfy. the order of di^missal pe®sedon 17-01-2011 ishereby recalled and the writ p^ittonrestored to its origuial number.Sd/-Manindra Mohan stlrivastavaJudgcTumanei-. ?T^-r<"T:if-—iS43—1/ 2012—1,50,000.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.