Mckinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-6
High Court
09 Aug 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mckinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-6
Date of order
09 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mckinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-6, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: All the appeals (ITA 461/2017, ITA 590/2017, ITA 82/2018 & ITA 526/2017) are consequently dismissed, without order on costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
*
+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 07.02.2018 Pronounced on: 09.08.2018
Reserved on: 07.02.2018
ITA 526/2017
MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT. LTD.
..... Appellant Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla & Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocates.
versus
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-6 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates.
+ ITA 590/2017
PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6
..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates
versus
MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT.LTD.
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla & Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocates.
+ ITA 82/2018
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6
..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti
Malhotra, Advocates.
versus
MCKINSEY KNOWELEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT LTD
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla & Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
1. The question of law framed in ITA 461/2017 & ITA 526/2017 is answered against the assessee; its appeals, therefore, have to fail. Likewise, the question of law framed in ITA 590/2017 & ITA 82/2018 is answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee; the revenue’s appeals, too, have to fail. All the appeals (ITA 461/2017, ITA 590/2017, ITA 82/2018 & ITA 526/2017) are consequently dismissed, without order on costs.
2. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 09.08.2018 in ITA 461/2017 may be referred to.
AUGUST 9, 2018
S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE)
A.K. CHAWLA (JUDGE)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue