Case LawHigh Court › Md. Javed v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-52...

Md. Javed v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-52(3),Kolkata & Ors

High Court 27 Feb 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Md. Javed v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-52(3),Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
27 Feb 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Md. Javed v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-52(3),Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
O – 120 ITA/121/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction [Income Tax]ORIGINAL SIDE MD. JAVED -Versus- INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-52(3),KOLKATA & ORS. BEFORE :THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAMAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYADate : 27[th] February, 2023 Appearance :Mr. Prithu Dudheria Adv.…for the respondent/revenue. The Court : We have heard Mr. Sukalpa Seal, learnedadvocate, who was initially appearing for the appellant and Mr.Prithu Dudheria, learned counsel appearing for the revenue. It is submitted by the learned advocate that he hasreturned the brief and also given no objection to the client toengage a different counsel and it appears, till date, that theappellant has not made any alternate arrangement on his part.The learned advocate had also sent a letter to the appellant on20[th] November, 2022 informing that the matter was adjourned bythis Court. Today, when the matter is called, none appears forthe appellant. In the light of the above, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) S.Das/K. Banerjee
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan