Mds Switchgear Limited v. Dy.cit
High Court
07 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mds Switchgear Limited v. Dy.cit
Date of order
07 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mds Switchgear Limited v. Dy.cit, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.351 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.351 OF 2003
MDS Switchgear Limited .. Appellant
V/s
Dy.CIT .. Respondent
Ms.Vasanti B.Patel for the Appellant.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 7th August, 2008
DATE : 7th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. This
Appeal has already been admitted on 16th October, 2004.
The learned Counsel for the parties categorically state
that the question of law raised in this Appeal, on which
this Appeal has already been admitted, is squarely
covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT
CIT
V/s.Parle Biscuits Ltd. - (2006) 282 ITR 547 (Bom),
V/s.Parle Biscuits Ltd. - (2006) 282 ITR 547 (Bom), in
V/s.Parle Biscuits Ltd. - (2006) 282 ITR 547 (Bom),
favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. In view
thereof, the question of law raised in this Appeal is
answered in favour of the Assessee and against the
Revenue. Appeal stands disposed of.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.