Case Law › High Court › Meena Somani v. Income Tax Officer, Ward...

Meena Somani v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), 'Rajad Bhawan' Cad Circle, Kota

High Court 14 Feb 2017 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

14 Feb 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Meena Somani v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), 'Rajad Bhawan' Cad Circle, Kota, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of above, writ petition is dismissed as renderedinfructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4895/2010 Meena Somani W/o Babu Lal Somani, Aged about 54 yearProprietor Swastik Stone, Bundi Road, Kota. ....Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), 'Rajad Bhawan' CAD Circle, Kota. 2. Commissioner of Income-Tax, 'Rajad Bhawan' CAD Circle Kota. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Atul Saxena for Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar For Respondent(s) :Mr. Nikhil Simlote for Mr. R.B. Mathur Mr. Atul Saxena for Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Judgment 14/02/2017 It is stated that by afflux of time, writ petition has becomeinfructuous. In view of above, writ petition is dismissed as renderedinfructuous. (M.N. BHANDARI)J. FRBOHRA

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.