Case LawHigh Court › Messrs Ami Gems v. V.c.daga,J

Messrs Ami Gems v. V.c.daga,J

High Court 26 Jun 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Messrs Ami Gems v. V.c.daga,J
Date of order
26 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Messrs Ami Gems v. V.c.daga,J, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.

Issue: Inthe above Appeal, the following substantial questionof law is sought to be raised:Whether on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case the Tribunal was justified in lawin holding that reassortment charges were notincludible in the business profits forcomputation of deduction under Section 80 H...

Decision: The Appeal is allowed accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.415 OF 2001 Messrs Ami GemsVs.The Income Tax Officer Ward 20(1)Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Appellant.Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for theRespondent. ..Appellant ..Respondent CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 26TH JUNE, 2007 P.C.1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Inthe above Appeal, the following substantial questionof law is sought to be raised:Whether on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case the Tribunal was justified in lawin holding that reassortment charges were notincludible in the business profits forcomputation of deduction under Section 80 HHCof the Act?2.For the reasons stated in the Income TaxApplication No.12 of 2001, the above question of lawis answered in favour of the Assessee and against theRevenue. The Appeal is allowed accordingly. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan