In Metro Exporters Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range 6(3, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.839 OF 2011
Metro Exporters Private Limited..Appellant.
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 6(3)..Respondent.
Ms.Vasanti B. Patel for the appellant.Mr.Abhay Ahuja for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & K.K. Tated, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 30[th] August, 2011.
1.Office objections waived. Office to register the appeal.
2.Counsel for the appellant -assessee states that the questions of law raised in this appeal are covered against the assessee by the decision of
this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kalpataru Colours & Chemicals reported in (2010)328 ITR 451 (Bom).
3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. Tated, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue