Mhu Complex, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035 v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle-2 (1), Chennai
High Court
25 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Mhu Complex, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035 v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle-2 (1), Chennai
Date of order
25 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mhu Complex, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035 v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle-2 (1), Chennai, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
CMP NO. 3752 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25-02-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
CMP NO. 3752 of 2025
in
TCA SR NO. 175858 OF 2024
Electronics Corporation Of Tamilnadu Ltd
692, MHU Complex, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.
Vs
The Deputy Commissioner Of Income TaxCorporate Circle-2 (1), Chennai
Appellant(s)
Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s):
M/s.A S SriramanFor Respondent(s):Mr.T.Ravikumar, Sr Standing Counsel
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.)
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 30 days in filing the above Tax Case
Appeal.
2. Mr.T.Ravikumar, the learned senior standing counsel who takes notice on behalf of
the respondent/Income Tax Department, has no serious objection to condone the delay https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3.The petitioner has given sufficient reasons explaining the cause of delay in filing the
above Tax Case Appeal to the satisfaction of this court and this court is convinced with
the same.
4. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the delay of 30 days in filing the above Tax Case Appeal is condoned. The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.
(S.S.SUNDAR J.) (C.SARAVANAN J.)
25-02-2025
CMP NO. 3752 of 2025 inTCA SR NO. 175858 of 2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.