In Midland Credit Management India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 16(1) Delhi & Ors, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Consequently since nothing further survives in the writ petition, the same shall stand dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~3
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16526/2023
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INDIA PVT. LTD.
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manuj Sabharwal, Adv.
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 16(1) DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. SC.
%
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R10.05.2024
1. Learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner states that the refunds have been duly processed and received.
2. Consequently since nothing further survives in the writ petition, the same shall stand dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
MAY 10, 2024 p’ma
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue