Case LawHigh Court › Migm Court Of Chmattisgarh : Bilaspur v....

Migm Court Of Chmattisgarh : Bilaspur v. Respondents Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Others

High Court 05 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Migm Court Of Chmattisgarh : Bilaspur v. Respondents Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Others
Date of order
05 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Migm Court Of Chmattisgarh : Bilaspur v. Respondents Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Others, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sybmits that theapplicationof thepetitioner fbr exemptionha^ alreadybeenconsidered and decided by order dated 24-3-2009 passed by theCommissionerof Income Tax, Raipur, thus, nothing survives in thispetition for adjudication and the petitioner rnay be perm...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

y'^-c^^/ THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREFOR CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURWRIT PETITION (T) No. ^5^ of 2010 In the^matter of / Petitioner Christian Fellowship HospitalaregisteredsocietythroughMedical Superintendent Dr. MonAbrahamS/oP.A.Abrahamaged about 45 resident of yearsG.E. Road, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^•$^a.V^^-^-^^1^^''".'^••^y-"^'"^'^..-^s&"VersusRespondents^d) Chief Commissioner ofIncome Tax New CentralRevenueBuildingCivilLines Raipur (C.G.)Commissioner of IncomeTax New Central RevenueBuildingCivilLines,Raipur(C.G.) ^2) AssistantCommissionerof Income Tax Circle 1(1)Raipur(C.G.) ^<3) Hon'bleThe Chief Aust[cearLdhis^ comBaiiionjudcies pf the Hon'ble Hjgh CoyrtofJudicature forChhattisciarh atBilaseyr. Petjtioa•tindeLArticle_226 of_th^. C^nstitutionof Jndla for issyanceof suitable_directions^orders or writs including writs in the nature ofmandamus certiorarietc. V'SS^NtA^. ••=<' MIGM COURT OF CHMATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION m N0.7098 OF2010 PETITIONERChristian Fellowship HospitalVersusRESPONDENTSChief Commissioner of Income Tax &Others (Writ Petition underArticles 226 ofthe Constitution of India)Single Bench ; Hoh'bleShri SatishK. Agnihotri, J. Present:-Shri Neelabh Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner.Shri Sameer Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 5th day of July, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sybmits that theapplicationof thepetitioner fbr exemptionha^ alreadybeenconsidered and decided by order dated 24-3-2009 passed by theCommissionerof Income Tax, Raipur, thus, nothing survives in thispetition for adjudication and the petitioner rnay be permitted towithdrawthispetition.A copy df theordersheetof theCommissioner of Incorne Tax,Raipur,is produced before thisCourt, which is taken on record.No objection from other side.It is ordered, as prayed for.Accordingly, the Ovrit petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-Satish K. AgnihotriJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan