In Mihir Textiles Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- MIHIR TEXTILES LTD.Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 197 of 1993
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- MIHIR TEXTILES LTD.Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 197 of 1993 NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 23/02/2004
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�When the matter is called out, none appears for
the assessee, though reference was made at the instance
of the assessee and though the matter has been pending
for the last ten years.
�Hence, we decline to answer the questions
referred for our opinion.
�The reference accordingly stands disposed of.
�����(M.S. SHAH, J.)
�����(M.C. PATEL, J.)
zgs/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.