Millennium Ceramic Llp v. Additional /Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Incometax/Income Tax Officer
High Court
05 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Millennium Ceramic Llp v. Additional /Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Incometax/Income Tax Officer
Date of order
05 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Millennium Ceramic Llp v. Additional /Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Incometax/Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16583 of 2021
==========================================================
MILLENNIUM CERAMIC LLP
Versus
ADDITIONAL /JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MANISH J SHAH(1320) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Respondent(s) No. 1NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 2==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAand
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 05/04/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Mr. Manish Shah, the learned counsel appearing for the writ-applicant has instructions from his client not to press this writ-application and withdraw the same as the cause no longer survives.
In view of such statement being made by Mr. Shah, this writ-application is disposed of as not pressed without expressing anyopinion on the merits of the case. Notice, if any, stands discharged.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
A. B. VAGHELA
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue