Case LawHigh Court › Misc.civil Application v. Dy. Commission...

Misc.civil Application v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Ors

High Court 11 Jun 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Misc.civil Application v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Ors
Date of order
11 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Misc.civil Application v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Ors, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 390 OF 2007 SMT. MIRA A. NAIK AND 4 ORS., VersusDY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND 2 ORS., ... Applicants ... Respondents Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the Respondents. -Coram:S.A. BOBDE &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:11th June, 2007 N. A. BRITTO, JJ. P.C.:- Heard. For the reasons stated in this application,the matter is restored tofile. S.A. BOBDE, J. RD. N. A. BRITTO, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan