Mitsubishi Electric India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle16(1), Delhi & Ors
High Court
16 Jan 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mitsubishi Electric India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle16(1), Delhi & Ors
Date of order
16 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mitsubishi Electric India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle16(1), Delhi & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~32
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 209/2024 & CM APPL. 983/2024
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
..... PetitionerThrough:Mr. Manuj Sabharwal, Mr.Sudip Lodh and Ms. Shalini,Advs.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE16(1), DELHI & ORS...... Respondents
..... RespondentsThrough:Mr. Shailendra Singh, Sr.Standing Counsel alongwithMs. Dacchita Shahi and Ms.Anuja Pethia, Advs forIncome Tax Department.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMARKAURAV
O R D E R
%
16.01.2024
1.Pursuant to the last order passed, Ms. Shahi, learned counselrepresentingtherespondents,hasplacedforourperusaltheinstructions which have been received and in terms of which therespondents acknowledge the pendency of the petition before theBoard of Advanced Ruling ["BAR"].
2.In view of the aforesaid, a statement is made that the impugneddemand shall not be given effect to till such time as proceedings arepending before the BAR.
3.The statement so made is recorded and accepted.
4.The petition along with pending application shall stand disposedof.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.JANUARY 16, 2024/MJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue