Case LawHigh Court › Mitsui Kinzoku Components India Pvt. Ltd...

Mitsui Kinzoku Components India Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals

High Court 24 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Mitsui Kinzoku Components India Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals
Date of order
24 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Mitsui Kinzoku Components India Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: Statement is accepted, CWP-19729-2021 (O&M) In view of the above, instant petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly, (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)JUDGE 24.03.2022 harjeet (PANKAJ JAIN)JUDGE 1) Whether speaking/reasoned?

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA.AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19729-2021 (O&M)Date of Decision:24.03.2022 Mitsui Kinzoku Components India Pvt. Ltd. _.. Petitioner Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) ... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TRJINDER SINGH DHINDSAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN. Present: Mr. Manuj Sabharwal, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent, TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. (QRAL). This case has been taken up through Video Conferencingvia Webex facility in the light of Pandemic Covid-19 situation and asper instructions. Instant petition was filed seeking a mandamus for directingthe respondent to finally conclude and for disposal of the appeal filedby the petitioner under Section 246-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961pertaining to the year 2016-17. Mr. Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent makes astatement that he has instructions that the appeal in question would befinally decided on merits within a period of four weeks from today. Statement is accepted, CWP-19729-2021 (O&M) In view of the above, instant petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly, (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)JUDGE 24.03.2022 harjeet (PANKAJ JAIN)JUDGE 1) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 11)Whether reportable? Yes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan