M.k. Road, Bombay-20. Appellant v. Dharti Builder & Development Respondent
High Court
16 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M.k. Road, Bombay-20. Appellant v. Dharti Builder & Development Respondent
Date of order
16 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M.k. Road, Bombay-20. Appellant v. Dharti Builder & Development Respondent, the High Court (2004) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.246 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Bombay City-IX, Aayakar Bhavan,
M.K. Road, Bombay-20. Appellant
versus
Dharti Builder & Development Respondent
None present.
CORAM : R. M. LODHA &
J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED : 16th August 2004
P.C.
P.C.
None appears for the appellant.
2. Dismissed in default.
3. The appellant is directed to recover the court fee
paid on this appeal from the official/officer due to
whose negligence the appeal went unrepresented and came
to be dismissed in default.
2
4. Let copy of this order be sent to the Commissioner
of Income-tax, Bombay City-IX, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.
Road, Bombay-20.
(R.M. LODHA,J.)
(R.M. LODHA,
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue