M.k. Road, Bombay-20. Appellant v. Tractor Engineers Ltd. Respondent
High Court
16 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M.k. Road, Bombay-20. Appellant v. Tractor Engineers Ltd. Respondent
Date of order
16 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M.k. Road, Bombay-20. Appellant v. Tractor Engineers Ltd. Respondent, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.249 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Bombay City-II, Aayakar Bhavan,
M.K. Road, Bombay-20. Appellant
versus
Tractor Engineers Ltd. Respondent
Mr. K. R. Chaudhary i/b. Mr. H. D. Rathod for the
appellant.
Ms. Heena Doshi i/b. T. Pooram & Co. for the
respondent.
CORAM : R. M. LODHA &
J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED : 16th August 2004
P.C.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the revenue fairly concedes
that the controversy raised in this appeal is squarely
concluded by the decision of the Supreme Court in the
case of Commissioner of Income-tax v. Indo Nippon
Chemicals Co. Ltd., 261 ITR 275.
2. He, therefore, seeks withdrawal of the appeal.
2
3. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
4. Refund of court fee as per law.
(R.M. LODHA,J.)
(R.M. LODHA,
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue