M.karthika,Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle, C.r.building v. Contemnor In Both Thepetitions
High Court
23 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
M.karthika,Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle, C.r.building v. Contemnor In Both Thepetitions
Date of order
23 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M.karthika,Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle, C.r.building v. Contemnor In Both Thepetitions, the High Court (2024) decided the matter under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
CONT P(MD)Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH
COURT
DATED: 23.02.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
CONT P(MD)Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2023
In
W.P.(MD)Nos.21901 & 21900 of 2023
Yennarkey R.Chiranjeevi Rathnam
M.Karthika,Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Corporate Circle, C.R.Building- No.2,V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road,Bibikulam,Madurai – 625 002,Madurai District.
vs.
... Petitioner in both the
Petitions.
... Contemnor in both thePetitions.
PRAYER:Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the Contemnor/respondent for deliberate and wilful disobedience of the order, dated 08.09.2023 made in W.P.(MD)Nos.21901 & 21900 of 2023.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CONT P(MD)Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2023
In both the Writ Petitions:
For Petitioner: Mr.J.JeyakumaranFor Respondent : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel
COMMON ORDER
These Contempt Petitions are filed against the order, dated 08.09.2023 made in W.P.(MD)Nos.21901 & 21900 of 2023 alleging disobedience of the order.
2. Heard Mr.J.Jeyakumaran, the Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, the Learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. The Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the Learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent had considered the case of refund and already granted refund to the tune of Rs.46,89,455/- and the same was credited in the petitioner's account. As far as the balance amount is concerned, the respondent had submitted that they have already adjusted the same.
CONT P(MD)Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2023
4. The Learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent further submitted that, it is stated in paragraph No.9 of the counter affidavit that, after receipt of the Order of this Court, the respondent sent email to the Commissioner of Income Tax, Centralized of Processing Centre, Bengaluru. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Centralized of Processing Centre, Bengaluru, has in turn granted an opportunity to the petitioner to respond for adjusting the amount, but the petitioner has not responded to the said email. The respondent waited for brief period. Thereafter in order to comply with the order and to avoid contempt the respondent had processed the refund application had adjusted the balance amount for the arrears amount for the previous assessment year.
5. Now the petitioner is praying to grant one more opportunity to contest the case and the petitioner may be permitted to respond to the email, dated 05.10.2023. But the Learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent vehemently opposed, since the process is already been completed, the respondent cannot reopen the same. Since the petitioner is claiming one more opportunity, this Court is directing the petitioner to submit an application to the Commissioner of Income Tax, Centralized of Processing Centre, Bengaluru,
3/6
CONT P(MD)Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2023
within a period of Four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. After receiving the said application from the petitioner, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Centralized of Processing Centre, Bengaluru, shall consider and pass an order, within a period of three months, thereafter.
6. Accordingly, these Contempt Petitions are closed.
Index : Yes / NoInternet : YesKSA
23.02.2024
Note to Office : Issue a copy of order on 18.03.2024
To
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle, Corporate Circle,
C.R.Building- No.2,
V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road,
Bibikulam,
Madurai – 625 002,
Madurai District.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Centralized of Processing Centre, Bengaluru, Centralized of Processing Centre, Bengaluru,
CONT P(MD)Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2023
6/6https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CONT P(MD)Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2023
S.SRIMATHY, J
KSA
Common Order made inCONT.P(MD)Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2023
6. Accordingly, these Contempt Petitions are closed.
Index : Yes / NoInternet : YesKSA
23.02.2024
Note to Office : Issue a copy of order on 18.03.2024
To
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle, Corporate Circle,
C.R.Building- No.2,
V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road,
Bibikulam,
Madurai – 625 002,
Madurai District.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Centralized of Processing Centre, Bengaluru, Centralized of Processing Centre, Bengaluru,
CONT P(MD)Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2023
6/6https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CONT P(MD)Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2023
S.SRIMATHY, J
KSA
Common Order made inCONT.P(MD)Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2023
23.02.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.