Case LawHigh Court › M.mukundan v. The Assistant Commissioner...

M.mukundan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcompany Circle I (6)Chennai 600 034

High Court 10 Aug 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M.mukundan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcompany Circle I (6)Chennai 600 034
Date of order
10 Aug 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M.mukundan v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcompany Circle I (6)Chennai 600 034, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: For Appellant : Mr.S.SridharFor Respondent : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar (Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department) J U D G M E N T(Delivered by V.Ramasubramanian,J.) In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for theappellant, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.8.2015 CORAM THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANandTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN Tax Case Appeal Nos.56 & 57 of 2012 M.Mukundan ...Appellant in both TCAs. Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCompany Circle I (6)Chennai 600 034....Respondent in both TCAs. Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, againstthe common order dated 31.8.2007 in ITA Nos.129 & 141/MDS/2003 forthe Block Period 01.4.1988 to 09.3.1999 on the file of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, filed against order of theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Central-1, 28/3/03 made in ITANo. 292/2001-2002 for the Assessment year 1/4/88 to 9/3/99 againstorder of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle (6)108, M.G. Road, Chennai - 34, made in PAN /GIR No. AAEPM 8262 E,dated 27.07.2001. For Appellant : Mr.S.SridharFor Respondent : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar (Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department) J U D G M E N T(Delivered by V.Ramasubramanian,J.) In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for theappellant, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2012 in TCA No.57 of 2012 is also dismissed. Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kpl To 1. The Assistant Registrar,Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Chennai 'B' Bench. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Cirle 1 (6),Chennai - 34. 3. The Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals (Central 1)Chennai - 34. 1 CC to Mr.S.Sridhar, Advocate SR.No.41844 1 CC to Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar (Standing Counsel for Income TaxDepartment), SR.No. 41698 TCA Nos.56 & 57 of 2012 JP (CO)PSI (31.08.2015)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan