Modgil Fashion Exports v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana
High Court
25 Sep 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Modgil Fashion Exports v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana
Date of order
25 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Modgil Fashion Exports v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA,260a2014 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA,260a2014 (O&M)Date of decision: 25.09.2014
Modgil Fashion Exports
... Appellant
... Appellant
VERSUS
Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana .... Respondent
CORAMHON9BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON9BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present)Mr.Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocate, withMr.Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate, and|Mr.Divya Suri, Advocate, for the appellant.
KOK oK
RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL)
The appellant challenges order dated 06.03.2014, passedby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench ‘A’,Chandigarh, primarily on the question of operation of Section 801A(9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act')V1S-a-vis deductions to be allowed under Sections SOHHC and SOIBot the Act.
We have heard counsel for the appellant and perused theimpugned order as well as the substantial questions of law.
The controversy, in hand, is no longer re-integra and hasalready been answered against the appellant in “Friends Casting P.Ltd. Vs. CIT [340 ITR 305 9P&H)|dd |
Counsel for the appellant is unable to distinguish theaforesaid judgment and, therefore, as the question of law framed in
ITA,260a2014 (O&M)
this appeal has already been answered, we have no option but todismiss the appeal in terms of the opinion recorded in the aforesaidjudgment.
Dismissed.
25.09.2014Shamsher S.Sabharwal
| RAJIVE BHALLA |JUDGE|} AMIT RAWAL JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.