Case Law › High Court › Modicare Limited v. Deputy Commissioner...

Modicare Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 14 New Delhi

High Court 09 Apr 2024 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

09 Apr 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Modicare Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 14 New Delhi, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Consequently, the present review petition shall stand dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3019/2023 MODICARE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Jain & Mr. Saksham Singhal, Advs. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 14 NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar & Ms. Easha, Advs. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R% 09.05.2024 Review Pet. 204/2024 (Judgment dt. 09.04.2024) The review petition fails to indicate any error apparent in the judgment dated 09 April 2024. We bear in mind that all matters in the batch were heard on the limited issues duly set out in our judgment. Learned counsels for parties were thus heard only on the issues as flagged. The review petition seeks us to delve into issues which were never argued. In any case, apart from the issues that stand concluded in terms of the judgment, all other rights and contentions of parties have been kept open. We thus find no justification to entertain the review petition. Consequently, the present review petition shall stand dismissed. YASHWANT VARMA, J MAY 9, 2024/kk PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.