Moet Hennessy India Private Limited v. Joint Commissioner Of Income-Tax

$~9 & 14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11/2019 MOET HENNESSY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikas Srivastava, Mr.Sumit Mangal and Mr.Vikrant Maheshwari, Advocates. versus JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX SPECIAL RANGE-6, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue. + W.P.(C) 17/2019 MOET HENNESSY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED MOET HENNESSY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikas Srivastava, Mr.Sumit Mangal and Mr.Vikrant Maheshwari, Advocates. versus JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX SPECIAL RANGE-6, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue. CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R% 04.01.2019 CM APPL. 38/2019 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 11/2019 CM APPL. 51/2019 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 17/2019 Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) Nos. 11& 17/2019 W.P.(C) 11/2019 & CM APPL. 37/2019 (stay)W.P.(C) 17/2019 & CM APPL. 50/2019 (stay) These petitions concern orders of attachment passed by the Revenue in respect of Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2011-12. Mr.Zoheb Hossain, learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue states that these demands have already been stayed by the authorities and the Income Tax Department has issued a letter dated 4[th] January, 2019 to the Petitioner’s bank, giving effect to this position by reducing the amount of the attachment. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue, these petitions have been rendered infructuous and the same are disposed of. PRATEEK JALAN, J. (VACATION JUDGE) JANUARY 04, 2019 ‘dc’ SANJEEV NARULA, J. (VACATION JUDGE) W.P.(C) Nos. 11& 17/2019