Mohammed Beevi v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward Ix (4),Chennai
High Court
10 Jan 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Mohammed Beevi v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward Ix (4),Chennai
Date of order
10 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Mohammed Beevi v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward Ix (4),Chennai, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Tax Case (Appeal) is dismissed returning the substantial questions of law unanswered.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.01.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
T.C.A.No.186 of 2012
P. Sheik Oli (deceased)
1.P.Abidha Banu
2.P.Beer Saleem
3.P.Beer Yasif
4.Minor P.Beer Anif
5.Minor P.Beer Sameem
6.Minor P.Beer Sabana Banu
7.Mohammed Beevi
vs
.. Appellants
The Income Tax Officer,Ward IX (4),Chennai.
.. Respondent
Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench 'B' dated 11.08.2011 in ITA No. 1427/Mds/2005.
For Appellants:No appearance
For Respondent:Mr.J.NarayanasamySenior Standing Counsel
T.C.A.No.186 of 2012
DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,J
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
Learned counsel for the appellant had reported no instructions in
the matter on 12.12.2024. We hence directed the Registry to issue notice
directly to the appellant.
2. The following service report is placed on file:
“Notice were returned unserved. On enquiries being made by me in the said address and it is reported that the said appellants gone out of country and it is returnable date is not known. Hence notice were returned unserved. Dated this 9[th] Jan 2025Sd/-Sd/-NazirBailiff”
3. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant,
this Tax Case (Appeal) is dismissed returning the substantial questions of
law unanswered. No costs.
slIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking orderNeutral Citation:YesToThe Income Tax Officer,Ward IX (4),Chennai.
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 10.01.2025
T.C.A.No.186 of 2012
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.