Case LawHigh Court › Mohammed Beevi v. The Income Tax Officer...

Mohammed Beevi v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward Ix (4),Chennai

High Court 10 Jan 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Mohammed Beevi v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward Ix (4),Chennai
Date of order
10 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Mohammed Beevi v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward Ix (4),Chennai, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Tax Case (Appeal) is dismissed returning the substantial questions of law unanswered.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.01.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN T.C.A.No.186 of 2012 P. Sheik Oli (deceased) 1.P.Abidha Banu 2.P.Beer Saleem 3.P.Beer Yasif 4.Minor P.Beer Anif 5.Minor P.Beer Sameem 6.Minor P.Beer Sabana Banu 7.Mohammed Beevi vs .. Appellants The Income Tax Officer,Ward IX (4),Chennai. .. Respondent Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench 'B' dated 11.08.2011 in ITA No. 1427/Mds/2005. For Appellants:No appearance For Respondent:Mr.J.NarayanasamySenior Standing Counsel T.C.A.No.186 of 2012 DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,J JUDGMENT (Delivered by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Learned counsel for the appellant had reported no instructions in the matter on 12.12.2024. We hence directed the Registry to issue notice directly to the appellant. 2. The following service report is placed on file: “Notice were returned unserved. On enquiries being made by me in the said address and it is reported that the said appellants gone out of country and it is returnable date is not known. Hence notice were returned unserved. Dated this 9[th] Jan 2025Sd/-Sd/-NazirBailiff” 3. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Tax Case (Appeal) is dismissed returning the substantial questions of law unanswered. No costs. slIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking orderNeutral Citation:YesToThe Income Tax Officer,Ward IX (4),Chennai. [A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 10.01.2025 T.C.A.No.186 of 2012
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan