Mohammed Burhanuddin Katthawala v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
High Court
07 Apr 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Mohammed Burhanuddin Katthawala v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
Date of order
07 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mohammed Burhanuddin Katthawala v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5295/2022
Mohammed Burhanuddin Katthawala S/o BurhanuddinKatthawala, Mohsin And Co. Jhalawar Road, Kota 324007,Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, Kota Having ItsAddress At Office of The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCircle-2, Kota, Central Revenue Building Rawat Bhata Road, KotaRajasthan Through Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shrawan Kumar Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent(s): Mrs. Parinitoo Jain, Advocate through VC
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment / Order
07/04/2022
Heard.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner uponinstructions would submit that till date no order of assessment hasbeen passed by the Assessing Authority.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that theissue involved in this petition is no longer res integra as it hasbeen put to an end by Division Bench of this Court in the decisionrendered on 27.01.2022 in Sudesh Taneja Vs. Income Tax Officer,Ward-1(3) & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2022 and batchof petitions) where the notices issued under Section 148 of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 have been found to be invalid andimpermissible in law and quashed.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, forthe reasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in theaforesaid cases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition isallowed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Mohita /4
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.