Mohinder Pal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals),Rohtak And Others
High Court
25 Mar 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Mohinder Pal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals),Rohtak And Others
Date of order
25 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mohinder Pal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals),Rohtak And Others, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 7839 of 2019 Decided on : 25.03.2019
Mohinder Pal
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),Rohtak and others
. . . Petitioner(s)
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
PRESENT: Mr. Mohinder Pal, petitioner in-person.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for quashing of the orders dated 10[th] December, 2015 (Annexures P-12 & P-13), dated 28[th] June, 2016 (Annexure P-17) and dated 07[th ]August, 2018 (Annexure P-23). Besides above, certain other prayers have also been made.
2.After arguing for sometime, the petitioner, who appears in-person states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to take recourse to the alternative remedies as are available to him, in accordance with law. It was not disputed that the order dated 07[th] August, 2018 (Annexure P-23), passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short 'the CIT(A)'] is appealable before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) under the provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act').
3.Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to him, in accordance with law.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
March 25, 2019J.Ram
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.